The anniversary offers an opportunity to look beyond any single year and consider how procurement has changed since the first year of this survey in 2022. What stands out is that the function has not followed a simple path from tactical to strategic. Its mandate has broadened, but so has the expectation to prove its value: control cost, anticipate risk, strengthen supply continuity, and turn technology investment into measurable outcomes.

Five takeaways from the research help show where procurement has been and where it may be heading next.

Takeaway 1: cost never left the job description鈥攂ut it鈥檚 now more important than ever

In 2022, procurement leaders were still operating in the shadow of the pandemic. Supply chain risk ranked as the leading organizational risk, while COVID-19 disruption was the top driver of digital transformation.

As conditions changed, procurement鈥檚 agenda expanded to resilience, visibility, supplier diversification, and digitalization. But cost never disappeared. In 2022, cost savings led the areas where respondents believed procurement could deliver greater value. In the 2026 study, 54% of executives identify cost savings and optimization as procurement鈥檚 primary contribution to the organization. The line of questioning is not directly comparable year over year, but the broader pattern reveals that a more strategic mandate has not lessened the importance of financial discipline.

That is not a retreat. Modern cost management requires understanding demand, supplier economics, working capital, risk, and the operational consequences of commercial decisions. Procurement鈥檚 cost mandate has become more sophisticated, not less important.

Takeaway 2: digital transformation has moved from funding to execution

One of the clearest changes is what now stands in the way of transformation.

In 2022, budget was the leading barrier to digital transformation at 30.2%. By 2026, it dropped to fourth on the list, as ease of deployment became the primary concern of 71.7% of executives, a category that did not exist as a response option in 2022. Budget still matters, but it is no longer the defining obstacle.

Procurement spent years making the case for technology investment. The conversation has moved past 鈥淐an we afford it?鈥� to 鈥淐an we actually implement it?鈥� Procurement leaders are now challenged to embed technology across real processes, data environments, and organizations.

The motivation for transformation has also shifted. In 2022, pandemic disruption was driving both preparation and investment. Today鈥檚 expectation of flat-to-cautious growth is more structurally normal, but the pressure to do more with less remains a constant. The question for today鈥檚 procurement teams is whether they can deploy new technology effectively enough to generate repeatable business value.

Takeaway 3: AI has raised both the opportunity and the standard

The latest findings make the scale of the AI shift unmistakable. Sixty percent of executives name digital transformation as procurement鈥檚 top strategic priority for the next 12 to 18 months, up from 38% in , with agentic AI emerging as the most sought-after near-term technology.

But enthusiasm is now accompanied by greater scrutiny. As AI enters category management, intake, sourcing, and other workflows, procurement leaders need to be clear about the business outcome being improved, the data required, and the controls governing how AI acts.

The five-year view shows how quickly expectations have advanced. In 2022, digital technology broadly led the category-management improvement agenda at 35.8%. By 2023 and 2024, priorities had grown more specific, centering on cost analysis, scenario planning, and data quality. By 2026, AI-driven and predictive insight is the dominant category-management priority, cited by 66.6% of respondents.

Technology is shifting from helping procurement professionals find information toward helping them interpret choices and execute defined tasks. As that happens, the value case must move with it鈥攆rom access to information toward measurable improvements in decisions and outcomes.

Takeaway 4: strategic influence is becoming more operational

For years, procurement leaders have talked about earning a 鈥渟eat at the table.鈥� But the research suggests that where procurement sits on the organizational chart may be becoming a less useful measure of its strategic influence.

In 2022, the COO was already the largest procurement reporting line at 33.5%, with the CFO close behind at 29.3%. By 2026, the COO share has risen to 44%, while the CFO share stands at 24.4%, and reporting lines to the CEO have declined from 18.8% to 15.7%.

This suggests that procurement鈥檚 strategic relevance is increasingly expressed through operational execution. Influence comes from improving decisions across cost, supply, risk, and technology鈥攏ot from where procurement appears on an organizational chart.

The results across recent years reinforce that shift. In 2023, 53% of executives agreed that procurement effectively collaborated with the rest of the organization to meet the company鈥檚 vision. That rose to 75% in 2024 and 90% in 2025, pointing to growing integration between procurement and the wider business.

That growing integration does not necessarily mean procurement has secured a permanent strategic role. In 2024, 70% of executives said procurement was actively involved in developing the wider organization鈥檚 digital transformation strategy, although only 18% strongly agreed. By 2026, executive confidence in procurement鈥檚 influence over digital transformation had fallen to 68%, down from 91% in 2025.

The contrast is telling: procurement is becoming more integrated with the business, but greater visibility does not automatically translate into sustained strategic influence. A seat at the table matters less than what procurement delivers once it is there.

Takeaway 5: the skills equation has changed

Technology is not the only thing procurement teams have had to reinvent. The capabilities required to use it effectively have changed just as quickly.

In 2022, skills gaps were relatively dispersed across technology (34.6%), category knowledge (32.0%), risk management (26.8%), and customer experience (25.6%). By 2025, AI proficiency and ethics had emerged as the leading skills priority at 68.2%, far ahead of more traditional procurement competencies at 34.1%.

But there is another part of the skills picture that deserves attention. In that same 2025 research, curiosity was prioritized by just 10% of respondents. That stands in contrast to what I continue to hear from procurement leaders, who increasingly describe curiosity as one of the skills that will separate the teams that thrive in the AI era from those that merely use the technology.

Traditional procurement expertise is not obsolete. If anything, more capable technology increases the value of professionals who understand categories, suppliers, markets, and organizational change. AI fluency on its own is not enough. As technology takes on more work, professionals need the curiosity to question outputs, challenge assumptions, explore what is changing in a market, and bring business context to the decisions technology helps inform.

The opportunity lies in combining deep commercial knowledge with greater AI fluency. The procurement professional of the next five years will need to know not only how to use new tools, but when to challenge their outputs, how to apply business context, and where human judgment still matters most.

The next chapter is about proof

Five years ago, procurement transformation was heavily shaped by external shocks. Today, organizations are making more deliberate choices about AI, analytics, talent, and operating models while being asked to deliver savings, manage volatility, and improve productivity simultaneously.

The next chapter is about forging a clear connection between strategic and cost value, and between human expertise and AI capability. Five years of research suggest procurement has earned a broader role. The next five will be about proving what it can do with it.

Gordon Donovan is global vice president of Research, Procurement, and External Workforce at 麻豆原创.

That is the leadership challenge procurement now faces: accelerating the pace and improving the quality of work while maintaining accountability across every supplier interaction and enterprise transaction. That challenge is especially significant because procurement teams are also being asked to control costs, manage risk, strengthen resilience, and support broader digital transformation efforts.

The urgency is real. In research from the 2026 Economist Enterprise report titled聽“,” sponsored by 麻豆原创, 56% of executives identified AI strategy as the main catalyst for procurement鈥檚 digital agenda. The study, which covered 2,648 C-suite leaders, also recorded lower confidence in the function鈥檚 ability to translate technology investments into consistently better outcomes.

What those findings suggest is that the next phase of AI adoption is not about access to technology. It is about building the governance, accountability, and data foundations needed to turn potential into measurable business value. The practical question is where to start.

Start with the outcome, not the technology

AI programs often begin with finding the best possible tool for a problem. Procurement leaders should reverse that sequence and focus on the desired outcome.

The first questions they should ask are, 鈥淲hat outcomes would impact the broader business, and what decision or workflow needs to improve?鈥� A sourcing team may need to shorten event preparation. A category manager may need earlier warning of price or supply changes. A purchasing organization may want to reduce off-contract buying. Each objective carries different data requirements, risk levels, and measures of success.

Defining the outcome first forces the question early, before deployment choices narrow your options. Leaders can specify which actions AI may complete, which recommendations require review, and which decisions must remain under human control. They can also set escalation rules for exceptions involving sensitive data, high-value commitments, supplier concentration, or regulatory obligations.

This turns governance from a final approval step into part of the operating design.

Build a connected data foundation

AI cannot provide dependable guidance when supplier records, contract terms, spend information, and risk signals are fragmented across systems. More importantly, an agent cannot safely execute work without the context that accompanies this information. Procurement needs unified data governance that covers common definitions, data ownership, access controls, and traceable sources. Without it, AI operates on assumptions rather than facts.

Perfection is not a realistic prerequisite, and waiting for it will stall progress. But organizations should be explicit about uncertainty. When information is incomplete, the system should surface that limitation or route the matter to a person rather than present an assumption as fact. As the Economist Enterprise research highlights, fragmented data remains one of the most significant barriers to realizing AI鈥檚 potential in procurement, and it is a barrier that governance can address.

Apply human oversight where it matters most

The right balance between human and AI involvement varies depending on the procurement activity. Routine, rules-based work can support greater automation, while strategic supplier decisions require a different standard.

The Economist Enterprise research shows that fewer than one in 10 respondents would give AI the lead across most procurement choices within three years. By contrast, 46% expect the technology to assist with tactical work, while people retain authority over strategic matters.

That balance reflects something procurement practitioners understand from experience. Data can indicate that a supplier offers favorable terms or strong performance. It cannot tell you whether that supplier will collaborate during a disruption, bring you new ideas before they to a competitor, or treat your business as a priority when capacity is tight. Those judgments depend on relationships, commercial context, and years of accumulated experience that no system fully captures.

As organizations adopt similar tools and draw from increasingly comparable data, the real source of differentiation will be how procurement leaders interpret those outputs and apply judgment.

Human review should therefore be concentrated where the consequences are greatest, not added indiscriminately to every automated step. Clear thresholds can protect control without recreating the delays AI is intended to remove.

Measure value and risk together

Responsible adoption will not scale through policy alone. Employees need to understand how AI changes their work, when to challenge an output, and who is accountable for the final decision. Procurement, finance, IT, legal, and operations also need a shared view of ownership before something goes wrong rather than after.

Metrics to determine success and failure should be defined before deployment. Cycle-time reduction, contract compliance, spend under management, user adoption, supplier performance, and risk response can all show whether a use case is working. These measures should be paired with indicators such as exception rates, human overrides, data-quality failures, and control breaches.

This matters because AI can produce visible efficiency without improving the decisions that matter most. In the same research, many executives reported that AI has yet to meaningfully improve procurement decision-making quality despite growing investment in the technology. That gap is the real opportunity.

Procurement leaders who link AI to specific outcomes, build connected data, assign clear decision rights, and prepare their teams to work alongside the technology will move beyond isolated automation toward something more durable. The organizations that get this right will not simply be the ones that automate the fastest. They will be the ones where AI amplifies judgement, relationships, and experience that procurement professionals have always brought to the table, and where accountability for the decisions that matter most remains firmly in human hands. 

Gordon Donovan is vice president of Research for Procurement and External Workforce at 麻豆原创.

Over the past several years, procurement has steadily expanded its influence inside the enterprise. As supply chains faced unprecedented disruption, procurement leaders became trusted advisors to the C-suite on resilience, risk management, and sustainability. Their visibility increased and so did the expectations placed upon them.

Now, the playbook is being rewritten once again.

Research from the 2026 Economist Enterprise Report titled , sponsored by 麻豆原创, finds that financial performance has reemerged as the primary benchmark of procurement鈥檚 success. Drawing on a global survey of 2,648 C-suite executives, the report found that 54% cite cost control as procurement鈥檚 greatest contribution to the business, up from 43% just one year earlier. The findings point to a function that is increasingly stretched, yet positioned to deliver measurable business outcomes鈥攊f it can navigate a difficult balancing act.

Cost control returns to center stage

The shift is not surprising given the environment. Persistent inflation, tariff uncertainty, and continued investment in supply chain resilience have pushed cost management back to the top of the executive agenda. At the same time, companies are investing in dual sourcing, nearshoring, and inventory buffering to reduce exposure鈥攕trategies that strengthen resilience but often raise costs. Procurement is expected to offset those increases elsewhere.

What makes this moment particularly challenging is that procurement鈥檚 broader responsibilities have not diminished. Teams are still expected to manage geopolitical risk, advance sustainability, and support digital transformation. The mandate has expanded significantly, often without a corresponding increase in capacity, tools, or operating model support. Delivering savings, limiting cost increases, and managing input costs while fulfilling a growing strategic role is the defining tension facing procurement leaders today.

AI is becoming procurement’s digital imperative

Technology, and AI in particular, is increasingly seen as the key to resolving tension. In the Economist Enterprise study, 60% of executives identified digital transformation as procurement’s top strategic priority over the next 12 to 18 months, up sharply from 38% in 2025. More than half (56%) identified AI as the primary driver of that transformation.

The emergence of agentic AI is accelerating expectations further. More than half of executives are planning to implement or evaluate agentic AI capabilities within the next 12 to 18 months. Unlike earlier generations of AI that focused primarily on generating insights, agentic AI introduces the ability to execute workflows鈥攆rom guided buying experiences to automated purchase order creation鈥攅nabling procurement to move beyond recommendations and drive actions.

Even so, executive expectations remain grounded. Only 9% of survey respondents want AI to lead most procurement decisions within three years. Procurement鈥檚 highest-value work continues to rely on human judgment, strong supplier relationships, and the ability to navigate complex trade-offs. AI plays a critical role in strengthening these capabilities, but it does not replace them.

Realizing that potential, however, requires the right foundation. Connected data, clear governance, and close collaboration across procurement, finance, IT, and operations are prerequisites for generating AI outputs that are reliable and accountable.

Category management takes on greater importance

As procurement balances cost pressures with broader business priorities, category management is emerging as a critical discipline. The report found that category and demand management are expected to receive the second highest level of digital investment among procurement disciplines over the next three years, trailing only spend and performance analytics.

This reflects the growing complexity of procurement decisions. Category leaders are no longer simply awarding projects to the lowest-cost supplier. They are expected to weigh cost, risk, sustainability, and supplier performance simultaneously鈥攁 level of complexity that demands better analytics and faster insight-to-action capabilities.

That level of nuance can strengthen procurement鈥檚 impact, but it can also slow execution. More sophisticated category strategies require better data, sharper analytics, and faster insight-to-action capabilities. The report found that category strategy has become the third most common source of process delays, behind only contracting and sourcing.

Success increasingly depends not on collecting more data, but on turning data into confident decisions quickly. Organizations that close that gap will be better positioned to execute strategy, not simply develop it.

Procurement’s strategic value is being tested

Perhaps the most striking finding in the report is a growing confidence gap. While nearly three-quarters of executives still believe procurement collaborates effectively across the organization, that figure dropped from 90% in 2025 to 74% in 2026. Confidence in procurement鈥檚 role in shaping digital transformation strategy also declined meaningfully over the same period.

These numbers do not signal a retreat from procurement鈥檚 strategic importance. Rather, they reflect a broader shift in how enterprise decisions are being evaluated. As AI democratizes access to data across the organization, more stakeholders have the information to question decisions and demand clearer evidence of value.

Procurement leaders are now expected to control costs, manage risk, strengthen resilience, and help guide AI adoption, often simultaneously and without additional resources. The question is no longer whether procurement belongs at the leadership table. It is whether procurement can consistently deliver the value expected of it across an expanding and increasingly complex set of priorities.

Procurement鈥檚 next chapter

The Economist Enterprise findings paint a picture of a function at a pivotal moment. Cost savings has returned as the primary mandate, yet procurement is still expected to manage risk, protect supply continuity, and lead digital transformation.

Meeting those expectations will require more than layering AI onto existing processes. It demands connected data foundations that make AI outputs trustworthy, visibility across suppliers and spending, and technology that enables teams to move from reactive decision-making to proactive intervention.

The leaders who will define procurement鈥檚 next chapter are those who can turn AI, data, and connected processes into faster decisions, stronger resilience, and measurable business impact.

Gordon Donovan is vice president of Research for Procurement and External Workforce at 麻豆原创.

External talent already represents a significant share of the labor: about 20% in the UK and 40% in the U.S., with projections reaching 50% globally by 2050. This surge reflects the growing demand for specialized skills and flexible cost structures.

A and conducted by Economist Impact captures this shift. Drawing on insights from more than 2,000 C-suite executives across industries, the report, 鈥淔rom Cost to Capability: Redefining External Workforce Strategy in 2025,鈥� reveals how the external workforce is evolving from a transactional resource into a core capability that drives adaptability and resilience in the AI era.

The findings underscore a critical imperative: organizations must rethink how they engage talent, integrate technology, and foster collaboration across procurement, HR, and finance to unlock the full potential of external workers.

From cost to capability: a strategic pivot

In 2023, nearly one-third of organizations cited risk reduction as their primary reason for using contingent labor and service providers. By 2025, that number dropped to just 6%. Today, cost efficiency (74%) and access to specialized skills (62%) dominate the list.

Cost efficiency is no longer about short-term savings. It鈥檚 about managing broader business risks, from financial exposure to talent scarcity. As Professor David Ulrich of the University of Michigan notes in the report, 鈥淭o mitigate risk, businesses need to reduce fixed costs, and labor is often a high fixed cost that needs to be seen as a source of growth.鈥�

Leaders increasingly view external talent as a long-term solution for project-based and technology-driven work, especially in fast-moving fields like AI, automation, and data science. Looking ahead, 64% of executives plan to expand their talent networks within three to five years, up from 54% last year鈥攃lear evidence that external workforce strategies are becoming integral to workforce planning.

Building a holistic talent ecosystem

Economist Impact鈥檚 research points to the rise of holistic talent supply chain management鈥攁 model that unites HR, finance, and procurement to forecast talent needs, close skills gaps, and treat the workforce as a dynamic ecosystem rather than a fixed headcount.

This evolution builds on the themes from previous Economist Impact reports, where procurement shifted from cost controller to strategic orchestrator of risk, sustainability, and innovation. Forward-looking organizations now embrace 鈥渢otal talent management鈥� models that integrate people, platforms, and partners while aligning culture and communication across internal and external teams.

Breaking down silos and embedding digital tools for real-time visibility will be essential to managing an integrated, skills-based workforce that adapts quickly to business needs鈥攚hile ensuring external workers feel valued and connected to enterprise goals.

Procurement at the center of workforce transformation

Procurement leaders are moving beyond sourcing and compliance to orchestrate entire talent ecosystems built on governance and collaboration. Yet the function faces challenges: confidence in procurement鈥檚 workforce management skills fell from 51% in 2024 to 43% in 2025, reflecting the complexity of its expanded scope.

CFOs and COOs are also taking a more active role, linking external workforce oversight to financial, compliance, and ESG performance. This trend echoes Economist Impact鈥檚 鈥溾�� report, which showed procurement鈥檚 remit expanding as risk management becomes central to business strategy.

To succeed, procurement must double down on visibility, digital integration, and strategic alignment. Platforms that unify workforce data鈥攆rom contingent contracts to skills mapping鈥攚ill enable teams to balance cost optimization with agility and governance.

AI: driving agility and accountability

Artificial intelligence is reshaping how organizations manage external talent. According to the report, 68% of procurement leaders cite AI proficiency and ethics as their top development priority over the next 18 months. AI can predict workforce needs, automate sourcing, and fill gaps in emerging fields like agentic AI and automation. The payoff: higher productivity and faster decision-making.

But AI also raises a critical questions: who benefits from efficiency gains? How should productivity improvements be measured? Answering these will require new cost models and shared accountability across the enterprise.

As seen in earlier Economist Impact research, AI is once again a catalyst for transformation, redefining how organizations manage, measure, and mobilize external talent.

The external workforce of the future

The evolution of the external workforce underscores a broader truth: agility, capability, and collaboration now define competitive advantage.

Organizations that treat external talent as a strategic asset鈥攊ntegrating governance, data, and culture across internal and external teams鈥攚ill be best positioned to respond to technological change and seize new opportunities.

To meet these demands, companies are turning to solutions like and , which help connect procurement and external workforce management. These solutions can deliver the visibility, intelligence, and agility needed to manage today鈥檚 dynamic workforce ecosystem.

Gordon Donovan is global vice president of Research, Procurement, and External Workforce at 麻豆原创.

In a , Economist Impact highlights this continuing shift in perception and performance, revealing a rising confidence in procurement鈥檚 ability to make business impact. This is the fourth consecutive year that 麻豆原创 and Economist Impact have partnered on a study, and the survey includes responses from more than 2,000 C-suite leaders globally.

The report, titled 鈥淭he Resilient Edge: Procurement in an Era of Polycrisis,鈥� also underscores procurement鈥檚 growing influence in advancing AI adoption and sustainability performance. However, the field still faces obstacles in assuming this larger role, including readiness for technology and building a future-proof workforce.

Still, the overall trend is clear: procurement鈥檚 fundamental transformation is putting it in a position to play an important role in business strategy.

Growing confidence in procurement to drive strategic value

Businesses today face a convergence of crises鈥攁 鈥減olycrisis鈥濃�攚hich includes environmental shocks, shipping delays, and growing regulatory restrictions. Tariffs are the latest disruption, prompting businesses across sectors to seek quick solutions to avoid price hikes.  

Weathering this storm requires procurement leaders to take on higher risk as they navigate this uncertainty. The Economist Impact report finds that geopolitical risk has emerged as the top concern for procurement leaders, with 64% listing it as their top focus over the next 12 to 18 months, up from just 30% in 2024. This surge reflects both the growing complexity of global operations and procurement鈥檚 expanding influence.

As risk becomes more multifaceted and severe, procurement professionals have a role beyond sourcing supplies at the lowest cost. Instead, they are developing robust strategies to identify, assess, and mitigate risk. This strategic pivot is also reflected in growing cross-departmental trust. In fact, 78% of respondents expressed confidence in procurement鈥檚 ability to manage external risk鈥攁 37% increase from last year鈥攕ignaling procurement鈥檚 growing value as a strategic partner.

AI has a central role in procurement

From detecting demand signals and enabling scenario planning to automating routine workflows, AI is dramatically expanding procurement鈥檚 capabilities.

The Economist Impact report notes that organizations are prioritizing AI proficiency more than any other skill over the next 12 to 18 months, including predictive analytics, demand forecasting, and managing data bias and privacy concerns. These skills are essential for procurement teams that need to pivot quickly in response to unexpected disruptions.

Most importantly, AI will be at the center of procurement鈥檚 continued transformation. An overwhelming 89% of respondents in the study said they are confident in their ability to adopt and apply AI to improve efficiency and productivity. This confidence is grounded in tangible benefits that AI can provide, including identifying early demand signals, optimizing supplier performance, and simulating risk scenarios to support better decision-making

Simply put, AI is no longer optional鈥攊t is essential to procurement success and relevance.

Improved environmental results

Sustainability has climbed to the top of corporate agendas, and procurement is now on the front lines of this effort, managing supplier emissions and ensuring ethical labor practices. Over half (53%) of survey respondents named sustainability as their top strategic priority for the next 12 to 18 months.

Cross-departmental collaboration is central to these efforts and has enabled procurement to align with key financial and environmental goals. Tools like ESG scorecards and supplier decarbonization plans are now standard practice for measuring environmental impact. These innovations are helping companies meet rising expectations from customers, regulators, and shareholders alike, while also reducing long-term operational risks.

These developments show that procurement isn鈥檛 just supporting sustainability鈥攊t鈥檚 driving it.

Procurement鈥檚 inflection point between strategy and cost-cutting

While cost control remains a key part of procurement鈥檚 mandate, the balance for today鈥檚 procurement teams is shifting鈥攆rom tactical cost-saving measures to strategic contributions that enhance agility, foster innovation, and safeguard reputation.

To manage these dual demands, companies are turning to procurement technology, like , to address key priorities and reduce siloes across the organization.

The insights above were explored in depth during an Economist Impact webinar titled,鈥淢easuring up: Balancing risks and goals for Strategic Procurement.鈥� To delve further into these topics and hear expert perspectives, .

Gordon Donovan is global vice president of Research, Procurement, and External Workforce at 麻豆原创.

The 麻豆原创-sponsored report offers insights from more than 2,300 C-suite executives spanning multiple countries, regions and industries and examines the pressures facing today鈥檚 procurement teams. As these teams manage risks like geopolitical shifts, supplier threats, and liquidity risks, the surveyed executives emphasize an urgent motivation to improve their procurement operations through agile, innovative, and fast-paced solutions.

Today鈥檚 complex and uncertain business environment has pushed procurement teams to take matters into their own hands. Not only are they accelerating digitalization by adopting emerging technologies like AI, they are driving it by searching for ways to change the procurement operating model.

As Always, It鈥檚 All About Innovation

Procurement officers view driving innovation as one of their function鈥檚 chief objectives. Doing so will help them navigate risks and respond to an evolving consumer environment.

When procurement is truly influential, it is proactive. Teams that understand digitalization and the technologies being acquired have more impact in this area than those that are reactive. Over two-thirds (70%) of the survey respondents agree that procurement is actively involved in developing their wider organization鈥檚 digital transformation strategy 鈥� though whether this is true in the day-to-day may vary from business to business.

If procurement is to play a more integral role in businesses, changes to the function鈥檚 operating model are likely for some organizations, which is why the research also shows that procurement is accelerating its digitalization, including through the adoption of emerging technologies. Approximately 84% of executives are confident in their procurement team鈥檚 ability to apply technology successfully to automate some processes and shift attention to more strategic and complex tasks.

This ability to seamlessly integrate and adopt new solutions will be critical as procurement teams work to balance capabilities, know-how, and expertise from suppliers to achieve the best possible results.

Digitalization Remains a Top Priority

While innovation is at the core of many companies鈥� priorities, C-suite leaders are laser-focused on the solutions that enable their teams to be more efficient, cost-effective, and risk-averse.

More than half (57%) of the C-suite cite digitalization as the top strategic priority for their procurement teams. This emphasis may be fueled by recent advances in generative AI, which is the top technology trend (34%) executives plan to implement in the next 12 to 18 months.

Digitalization efforts can offer real-time capabilities that better address dynamic market challenges and make existing procurement processes more efficient. Data-driven insights allow for more actionable outputs in strategic decision-making and can even impact procurement鈥檚 role in engaging contingent labor. Augmented with AI, they can easily manage contingent labor by streamlining and standardizing recruiting processes like job advertising, resume scanning, expediting background checks, and more.

More efficient intake management also goes hand-in-hand with digitalization. While generative AI occupies the highest priority, intake management is only one percentage point behind it, making it the second-most likely tech trend to be piloted or implemented. 

Value of Multi-Sourcing and Supplier Diversity

The top organizational risk for procurement was monetary uncertainty (49%), as macroeconomic risks can have a large impact on operational external risk. This is a potential factor as to why procurement teams are focused on risk as a longer-term priority.

Updates here can create opportunities like multi-sourcing, which can improve risk reduction and resilience amid growing external threats, and supplier diversity 鈥� driving market expansion through a more diverse supplier base. This can also reduce single-sourcing dependencies to mitigate risks against potential disruptions.

These possibilities prove how companies must make it a mission to improve the quality of data and the models needed to effectively analyze it. Subpar data directly hinders procurement鈥檚 ability to make good decisions, undermining its overall effectiveness and derailing successful digitalization before it takes hold.

Executives Agree: Time to Go All-In on AI

No other strategic priority attracts nearly as many responses as a priority across all industries as digitalization. However, respondents also agreed on one other key topic: the role that AI will take in the digitalization journey.

Adoption of an AI strategy stands at the joint top of executives鈥� list of digitalization priorities for procurement, alongside spend analytics, both cited by 44%. Almost half (48%) of executives aim to use AI to improve procurement processes through source-to-pay and AI-enabled spend management and decision support.

As the main drivers for digital transformation in procurement, these two objectives are complementary. AI tools can read a contract to evaluate clauses and suggest how they can be improved. It can also enhance data management, streamlining the processes needed to make key procurement decisions.

Fully digitalizing procurement operations has been on the function鈥檚 agenda for several years, but it is a continuous challenge. It is a process that does not have an endpoint, particularly as technologies advance quickly. The leading technologies from just three years ago pale in comparison to what can be accomplished today, which require knowledge across software development, APIs, and AI.

Therefore, success in building a thorough and adaptable AI strategy requires top-level expertise. Acquiring the necessary skills could entail considerable organizational and cultural change in procurement and across the business 鈥� extending beyond the structural shifts and developing new ways of working to build these skills.

The Start of a Procurement Renaissance

Across industries, procurement is already finding new ways to add value to the organization. But now that chief procurement officers and their teams are more consistently gaining a seat at the decision table, the challenge is to keep it.

The ongoing state of disruption offers ample opportunity for procurement teams to continue evolving and demonstrate their worth. Above all, improving collaboration with other business stakeholders will be the key to strengthening procurement鈥檚 role within the organization. Today鈥檚 technology-driven initiatives are as much a human challenge as they are a technology one, and when organizations are planning these initiatives it is clear that they need to consider people, process, and technology in equal measure to ensure success.

For more about the findings from this year鈥檚 Economist Impact report, tune in to this podcast hosted by Art of Procurement: .

Gordon Donovan is global vice president of Research, Procurement, and External Workforce at 麻豆原创.

In the Economist Impact report, titled “” and sponsored by 麻豆原创, surveyed executives share increased confidence in procurement to deliver against risk-mitigation objectives. Particularly when it comes to internal risk, which involves stakeholder management and strategic alignment, confidence levels rose to 83% this year, from 64% last year. This illustrates that procurement is becoming more aligned with key stakeholders across the organization.

However, a “state of permanent crisis” has shaken executives鈥� confidence in procurement鈥檚 ability to manage external risks such as geopolitical shifts, supplier threats, and liquidity risks.

Procurement鈥檚 role in business strategies is ever-growing, but it is imperative to maintain agility.

Heightened Attention to Risk Management

Ongoing inflation, global conflicts, and fluctuating commodity prices have placed risk management at the center of business strategies. Procurement plays a pivotal role in this effort by identifying high-quality alternative products and services while limiting costs.

Yet, respondents noted concerns over procurement鈥檚 ability to manage external risk factors, as only 41% of respondents said they are highly confident in its ability to control vulnerabilities. Comparatively, in 2023, 62% of business leaders expressed assurance in procurement鈥檚 handling of these factors, like supplier shortages, market fluctuations, and supply chain disruptions. Several drivers are pushing this trend, as the report notes that organizations experience four supply chain disruptions every day. Also, inflation continues to influence organizational decision-making, as monetary uncertainty was listed as the top organizational risk priority for procurement. Additional key external factors impacting organizational strategy over the next 12 to 18 months are macroeconomic (71%) and legal and regulatory risks (70%).

Diversifying Supplier Relationships

Businesses have looked to ease fears of shortages by moving away from sole sourcing suppliers. According to the survey, 40% of executives aim to prioritize supply chain diversification to build trusted and long-lasting relationships. In fact, three of the top five strategies listed in the survey are focused on mitigating risk, including reshoring/nearshoring and multi-sourcing.

Visibility has also been listed as one of the highest two priorities for a second consecutive year, proof that it is an urgent need for organizations to invest in technology that increases access to supply chain metrics, develops connections with suppliers, and identifies alternative sellers. Platforms that utilize automation, AI, and advanced analytics are another way to enable procurement teams to make data-driven decisions that improve efficiency and reduce risk.

Sustainability: Procurement鈥檚 Green Thumb

ESG ranked second on the list of priorities for the next 12 to 18 months, an increase from fifth in 2023.

鈥淧rocurement鈥檚 work at the convergence between the business and wider supply-chain ecosystem thus offers it a unique strategic opportunity to lead the sustainability agenda,鈥� the report states. By engaging with sourcing and suppliers, two critical stakeholders in achieving sustainability KPIs, procurement can use its role to translate companies鈥� green ambitions into tangible results.

New regulations such as the (ESRS) and (CSRD) have driven companies to enhance their sustainability practices. 聽According to the Economist Impact report, procurement has capitalized on this opportunity to gain the confidence of executives across the C-suite, with 68% of business leaders expressing belief in procurement鈥檚 abilities to deliver against ESG objectives. This is an increase from 49% in 2023, signaling that procurement鈥檚 remit has expanded beyond cost management.

Sustainability has also become a critical risk category, as 39% of respondents listed compliance as a driver to becoming greener. A failure to conform to governmental policy can lead to penalties and fines that limit growth.

to discuss strategies that leading companies are using to develop sustainable supply. The discussion also includes insights into how procurement can add value to ESG initiatives beyond compliance and reporting.

Leveraging Technology for Sustainable Sourcing

Procurement鈥檚 role in engaging buyers and suppliers to drive sustainability is pivotal. CPOs can set standards for sustainable sourcing and supplier practices, reducing carbon footprints and helping reach ESG benchmarks.

The increasing alignment of procurement with C-suite priorities is seen through the increased focus on sustainability and risk management. The shift in reporting lines toward COOs and the greater involvement in strategic discussions highlight the growing influence of procurement in organizational decision-making.

The expanded role of procurement has placed it at an inflection point, with heightened expectations to deliver results beyond cost mitigation. How will procurement leaders meet these new demands? Investing in technology offers a solution for uncovering valuable insights that to demonstrate procurement鈥檚 value. Coupled with developing people and processes, this approach allows procurement leaders to successfully fulfill their increasing remit.

Utilizing 麻豆原创 Business Network for Strategic Priorities

Business leaders should look for a platform to bridge the gap between companies and buyers and suppliers, enhancing visibility, collaboration, efficiency, and compliance. By leveraging such a comprehensive solution, companies can streamline their procurement processes, reduce silos, mitigate risk, and achieve substantial time and cost savings.

can align these benefits with the strategic priorities of risk management and sustainability. The technology has facilitated 780 million B2B transactions and $5.8 trillion in annual commerce, highlighting its vast influence across 190 countries. There has also been a 13% growth in transacting relationships and a 7.3% increase in B2B transactions over the past 12 months, a testament to our growing global community.

Embracing the Future of Procurement

With growing confidence from executives and risk-focused strategies, procurement is well-positioned to lead organizations through today鈥檚 complex business environment. The Economist Impact report underscores this belief, but procurement teams must aim to ensure long-term success by leveraging digital transformation.

Through in-depth interviews and targeted research, the Economist Impact report provides a broad analysis of the state of procurement.

View the and download the .

Gordon Donovan is global vice president of Research, Procurement & External Workforce at 麻豆原创.

These are among the findings of the newly released , conducted by and sponsored by 麻豆原创. In examining the current state of services procurement, the study seeks to answer two basic questions: Is procurement moving beyond the role of 鈥渁 pass-through for services contracts鈥�? And how are procurement teams using new approaches and technology to innovate services procurement?

The Challenges of Procuring Services

Whether it鈥檚 for IT consulting, marketing services, facilities management, or legal services, procuring services through a third party gives organizations access to personnel with advanced skills and expertise. It can also be cost-effective.

Business leaders have taken note, as highlighted in . 鈥淥n average, professional services spending comprises between 45% and 65% of an organization鈥檚 total non-employee spending,鈥� Ardent reports.

However, acquiring these services requires a significant level of procurement sophistication. Many services are too complex to fit neatly into a catalog and sourcing them requires organizations to consider key questions, including:

• Are we buying labor or an outcome?
• What is the cost mechanism 鈥� daily rates, time and materials, fixed-fee?
• Can we balance risk with agility?
• How do we maintain our service provider relationship?

Procurement teams have the expertise to bring a higher level of maturity to professional services. They provide a strategic approach that streamlines everything from sourcing and contracting to invoicing and vendor management. But are businesses taking full advantage of their expertise?

Three Things the Study Tells Us

The Art of Procurement study reveals a lot about the state of professional services procurement. Here are a few of my thoughts 鈥� from a global perspective.

Many organizations aren鈥檛 benefiting from technology.

Fifty percent of respondents said they purchase services contracts via e-mail and phone, and 23% buy from the same procurement catalogs they use to buy goods. Only 27% use a technology platform designed for services procurement.

Choosing not to use services procurement technology creates compliance and governance challenges. It also limits buyers鈥� ability to get the best pricing. Moreover, e-mails and phone calls don鈥檛 provide a secure, centralized data trail, which is useful for demand planning and forecasting and for making strategic decisions about insourcing and outsourcing.

Too often, bidders seek fixed pricing. That inhibits innovation.

Seventy-nine percent of respondents said they use some form of fixed pricing to buy services. Although this allows them to know the price up front, it also presents challenges. For example, with fixed pricing, statements of work must be tightly written to detail exact project requirements. Otherwise, businesses could pay for more than they receive.

The Art of Procurement research also notes 鈥渁 worrisome lack of risk and reward mechanisms in services procurement contracts.鈥� It warns that disregarding these innovative mechanisms can jeopardize supplier relationships and stifle innovation. 鈥淲ithout clear incentives for success and mitigations for failure, procurement could unintentionally foster a transactional, short-term mindset in suppliers, leading to cut corners or a reluctance to invest in long-term innovation.鈥�

Organizations prefer single project bids, which are less efficient.

In the survey, 39% of respondents said they set rates by project. Managing bids one by one forces businesses to go back to the market continuously 鈥� requiring more proposals, more negotiation, and more contracts.

But there鈥檚 also good news. The remaining 61% of respondents say they use either frameworks or preferred supplier panels to drive efficiency. A framework is a general agreement with pre-qualified suppliers, outlining terms and conditions under which specific goods or services will be procured. Panels are groups of pre-approved suppliers, selected for their ability to deliver specific services. These suppliers meet specific qualification criteria and have undergone a competitive selection process.

Overall, the Art of Procurement study paints a picture where procurement is not putting forth its expertise to help the business acquire and manage professional services. As such, it is conceding its strategic role to stakeholders and suppliers.

How Technology Can Help Turn the Tide

The Art of Procurement study advises procurement teams to 鈥渟elect and implement technology with breadth in mind, aiming to address as much services spend as possible rather than allowing pockets of sourcing activity to flow through non-standard platforms and processes.鈥�

is a broad technology application that can simplify how external services projects are initiated, engaged, managed, and completed. It can enable procurement teams to:

• Initiate service requests with competitive bidding, facilitating collaboration on bid criteria with colleagues, expedited approvals for authorized terms and budgets, and distribution of bids to services providers.
• Engage selected vendors through a negotiation process that follows a side-by-side evaluation of all responses, and then finalize an agreement.
• Manage global services engagements within a single, centralized system 鈥� securely onboarding workers, tracking deliverables, validating work, and generating invoices.
• Complete the project with automated offboarding, including terminating system access, retrieving assets, and giving performance feedback.

麻豆原创 Fieldglass has been named to the G2 list of , based on user reviews. It is also one of G2鈥檚 .

Procurement Must Lead the Way

Based on the findings of the Art of Procurement study, it鈥檚 clear that organizations need to adopt a more mature approach to services procurement. Procurement teams have the expertise to lead this transformation, although they must do more to assert themselves within the business. Technology can help accelerate this by enabling procurement to establish consistent, end-to-end processes for initiating, engaging, and managing external service projects.

Read the Art of Procurement report .

Gordon Donovan is global vice president of Research, 麻豆原创 Procurement, and External Workforce at 麻豆原创.