Âé¶¹Ô´´ research reveals AI adoption is siloed across lines of business, with each department facing unique challenges toÌýrealiseÌývalueÌý
SYDNEY —ÌýThe business functions with the greatest potential to unlock enterprise-wide AI value may also be creating its biggest constraints, according toÌýaÌýnewÌýanalysis ofÌýglobal research released today at Âé¶¹Ô´´ NOW in Sydney.ÌýÌý
The new research found that, while enthusiasm for enterprise AI is driving both investment and ROI, siloed adoption has createdÌýfive enterprise fault linesÌýthat threaten to mitigate potential gains.ÌýIn particular,ÌýFinanceÌýteams are forging ahead in a silo,ÌýLegalÌýteams are struggling withÌýgovernance gaps, shadow AIÌýis rifeÌýin customer-facing teams, HRÌýis managing aÌýdataÌýdeficitÌýandÌýProcurementÌýteams are dealing withÌýinnovation outrunning its foundations.ÌýÌý
“OrganisationsÌýaren’t missing out on value from AIÌýbecauseÌýtheyÌýlack ambition or investment.ÌýInstead, the dollars are falling throughÌýtheÌýcracksÌýbetween functions,â€� said Rachel Hunter, Head of AI, Âé¶¹Ô´´ÌýAustraliaÌýand New Zealand. “TheÌýorganisationsÌýthat make the most of AIÌýwill be thoseÌýwho remove AI sprawl andÌýconnect the discipline of Finance, the oversight of Legal, the pace ofÌýSales and Marketing, Procurement’s innovation and the workforce focus of HR around trusted data and shared outcomes.â€�
OrganisationsÌýaren’t missing out on value from AIÌýbecauseÌýtheyÌýlack ambition or investment.ÌýInstead, the dollars are falling throughÌýtheÌýcracksÌýbetween functions.
Rachel Hunter
InconsistentÌýAI sprawl across functions has enterprise-wide consequences for outcomesÌý
The new insights have been sourced from the Âé¶¹Ô´´ Value of AI 2026 report, which spoke to 2,600 business leaders across 13 countries toÌýexplore howÌýbusinessÌýinvest, implement, and drive value from AI. The new analysisÌýhasÌýidentifiedÌýkey challenges across five critical business functions.Ìý
Finance is mature but its silos could slow everyone else.ÌýÌý
- FinanceÌýrespondents noted they had invested more than any other function, leading to 65% noting they were scaling or leading in AI automation and 52% scaling or leading in generative AI.
- Yet only 16 per cent of its AIÌýis currently deployed across functions, thoughÌýthat’sÌýexpected to rise to 45 per cent in just two years.ÌýÌý
- Only 34 per cent of Finance respondents considerÌýthemselvesÌýdata readyÌýfor AI, and integration or interoperability is its largest agentic AI barrier.ÌýGivenÌýFinance touchesÌýall points ofÌýthe enterprise, keeping itsÌýAIÌýcapabilityÌýsiloedÌýmay limit far more than Finance’s own returns.Ìý
Legal is least ready to govern the AI it is most aggressively deploying.ÌýÌý
- LegalÌýrespondents applyÌýAI to moreÌýtasksÌýthan any other functionÌýatÌý33 per centÌýtoday,Ìýwhich isÌýexpected to reachÌý50Ìýper centÌýinÌýtwo years.ÌýÌý
- Yet 49Ìýper cent say AI is not delivering its full potential, the highest of any function.ÌýÌý
- While Legal respondents were most likely to noteÌýa defined AI strategyÌýat the leadership level (82%),Ìýit also reportedÌýthe lowestÌýgovernanceÌýreadinessÌýfor AI processes and frameworksÌýat 26 per cent. The function intended to provide the guardrailsÌýis itselfÌýmost in need of stronger foundations.Ìý
Customer-facing teams are moving fast and creating governance exposure.ÌýÌý
- Sales and Marketing respondentsÌýhave theÌýsecondÌýhighest data readiness at 63 per cent, trailing only Operations,Ìýand theÌýranked theÌýhighestÌýforÌýpilotingÌýagentic use cases (68%).ÌýÌý
- YetÌýmoreÌýSalesÌýandÌýMarketingÌýrespondentsÌýsaidÌýst shadow AIÌýwas the most material AI risk to them atÌý80ÌýperÌýcent,ÌýÌýwhileÌý73 per cent reportedÌýshadow AI useÌýat least occasionally. The functionÌýmay beÌýmoving faster thanÌýits data readiness or governance today.Ìý
HR couldÌýlead workforce transformation if its data can earn trust.Ìý
- HRÌýrespondentsÌýemergedÌýas one of the frontÌýleadersÌýinÌýGenerative AIÌýmaturity, withÌý24Ìýper centÌýleading in implementations despite respondents havingÌýtheÌýone of theÌýlowestÌýaverageÌýAI spending levelsÌýat US$25.1Ìýmillion.ÌýÌý
- Yet data readiness stands at just 37Ìýper cent. In a function responsible for the enterprise’s most sensitive workforce decisions, that data gap could undermine theÌýtransformationÌýHR is best placed to lead.Ìý
Procurement’sÌýinnovation is outrunning its foundations.Ìý
- Procurement respondents are ahead of most other functions in leading agentic AI maturity and cross-functional AI deployments, despite lower spending than some functions like Finance.Ìý
- ItsÌýrespondents are alsoÌýstrategically aware, being the most likely to agreeÌý(78%)ÌýthatÌýdelivering ROI from AIÌýrequires dataÌýreadiness,ÌýintegrationÌýand use-case readiness.ÌýÌý
- YetÌý86Ìýper cent report incomplete or inconsistent dataÌý–Ìýthe highest of anyÌýfunction.ÌýProcurement’sÌýambition is clear, but without stronger data foundations it risks creating isolated breakthroughs rather than scalable enterprise value.Ìý
Strategic adoption, not investment,ÌýnowÌýdeterminesÌývalueÌý
For leaders, the next phase of AI is not about adding more isolated use cases. It is about joining the strengths already present across the businessÌýtoÌýextending Finance’s discipline beyondÌýits boundaries, equipping Legal to govern at the pace of adoption, bringing shadow AI into trusted environments, giving HR the data quality needed to transform work responsibly, and connecting Procurement’s innovation to dependable data and enterprise workflows.Ìý
“TheÌýorganisationsÌýpulling ahead will treat AI as an enterprise operating model, not a series of departmental technology projects,â€� said Hunter. “That means shared data, connected processes, clear governance and a workforce equipped to use AI with confidence. Investment matters, but integration is what turns it into value.â€�
